<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early thoughts on Drupal Gardens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/drupal-gardens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/drupal-gardens/</link>
	<description>Become contented about Content Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:24:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philippe Parker</title>
		<link>http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/drupal-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/?p=211#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>I never said that Acquia was the first company to do hosted CMS, or WYSIWYG CMS. But I doubt that they&#039;ve ripped off anyone. Is Squarespace based on Drupal 7? Even if it were, I couldn&#039;t comment on how everyone is acting within their licence.
The point is, is the product any good, and who is it good for? Otherwise we&#039;ll all be looking at how CGI and mainframes evolved instead of how people might engage online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said that Acquia was the first company to do hosted CMS, or WYSIWYG CMS. But I doubt that they&#8217;ve ripped off anyone. Is Squarespace based on Drupal 7? Even if it were, I couldn&#8217;t comment on how everyone is acting within their licence.<br />
The point is, is the product any good, and who is it good for? Otherwise we&#8217;ll all be looking at how CGI and mainframes evolved instead of how people might engage online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripoff</title>
		<link>http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/drupal-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/?p=211#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>Are you aware this product is just a direct ripoff of http://www.squarespace.com/, which has has this exact interface (only more polished) for years?

See their tour.   

Why are you covering ripoffs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you aware this product is just a direct ripoff of <a href="http://www.squarespace.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.squarespace.com/</a>, which has has this exact interface (only more polished) for years?</p>
<p>See their tour.   </p>
<p>Why are you covering ripoffs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coonen</title>
		<link>http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/drupal-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/?p=211#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Being a beta, it was probably a good thing to launch while Steve Jobs was basking in the limelight. What a great illustration of how two successful and highly innovative technology companies go to market: 

One, an intensely proprietary juggernaut, fiercely defending its image, driven by public stockholders and more immediate ROI; the other launched and supported by an open source community, now coming to the commercial market after a nine-year incubation in the greenhouse.

Both have had immense success at engaging a very loyal, very powerful community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a beta, it was probably a good thing to launch while Steve Jobs was basking in the limelight. What a great illustration of how two successful and highly innovative technology companies go to market: </p>
<p>One, an intensely proprietary juggernaut, fiercely defending its image, driven by public stockholders and more immediate ROI; the other launched and supported by an open source community, now coming to the commercial market after a nine-year incubation in the greenhouse.</p>
<p>Both have had immense success at engaging a very loyal, very powerful community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

